Filed under: Activism, Beauty, Body Beautiful, Body Image, Double Standard, Feminism, Feminist, Spain, Women's roles
Womensnews E-mailed this article today about Spain’s attempts to promote a “healthy” body image and it is truly interesting; my sentiments, bravo Spain! But more importantly why isn’t this issue more important to the global community and specifically the American media. Spain recognizes that women are suffering; why don’t we? Take a look at the article, decide how you feel:
Spain Sizes Up Fashion World’s Measuring Stick
By Brenda Gazzar
WeNews correspondent
MADRID, Spain(WOMENSENEWS)–The Spanish government has just finished measuring the bodies of more than 10,000 women to help create new guidelines for the clothing industry.
The Feb. 7 study concluded that Spanish women come in three basic shapes–hourglass, pear and barrel–which consumer advocates say should serve as a more accurate base for sizing.
In part, the effort is about reducing the amount of trial-and-error time in the fitting room. Current sizes are based on pre-1975 models, when women’s bodies were significantly different, and clothes often vary by two to three sizes from store to store.
“From the perspective of the consumer, it’s an inconvenience,” said Angeles Heras, director general of the Madrid-based National Institute of Consumer Affairs, which conducted the five-month study for Spain’s Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs.
But it’s also an effort to promote healthier body images: receiving honest and reliable information about their clothing size can help women to more readily accept their bodies as they are, goes the logic.
Manufacturers around the world often fudge sizes to make consumers feel better but they are also misleading their customers and supporting distorted perceptions of what constitutes a healthy and beautiful body, Heras said in an interview last November, while the study was being conducted. “It’s clear that fashion greatly influences the health of women,” she said. “There are many psychological disorders that stem from wanting to be thin. . .We want to promote models of healthy beauty.”
Rethinking Sizes
The $2.5 million study advocates using a three-digit sizing system that takes into consideration the perimeter of a woman’s bust, waist and hips, in relation to height. Clothes are currently limited to one simple size because “anatomy had always established scientific categories according to the male gender,” the National Institute of Consumer Affairs said in a press release.
The study found 86 percent of women in Spain had a conventional body mass index. This means that whatever their description–underweight, normal or overweight–they do not require medical consultation or treatment. About 12 percent–particularly among women over 50–suffer some form of obesity. About 1 percent–particularly among young people–is moderately or severely thin.
More than 90 percent of the clothing industry–including such popular Spanish retailers as Zara and Mango–have volunteered to standardize their sizes according to the study’s findings within five years.
The women–recruited randomly from around the country to represent 10 age groups–were measured inside booths that use laser beam technology to obtain their three-dimensional body shape. That information was supplemented by manual measurements.
More than 40 percent of the subjects said they sometimes or always had problems with clothing sizes. Among them, 43 percent said they found sizes too small for their bodies and 22 percent found them too large. Another 8 percent said their size was too common, which made it difficult to find in the store.
Aiming for Realism
Even though Heras said many women prefer to fit into a smaller size, she thinks standardized sizes will give women a more realistic and accurate picture of their true size.
“What we are aiming for is to know what we are” regardless of the size “because beauty can be real and can adapt to real women,” she said.
The 2007 agreement also requires signatories to replace their conspicuously thin mannequins with those that are at least a European size 38 (or U.S. 8). They have also agreed to change the way they treat size 46 (or U.S. 16). Previously regarded as a “special size” for larger women, it will now be regarded as a normal size and be part of their routine inventory.
Alicia Hormigo, a 50-year-old teacher from Madrid, approves of the changes ahead whether they affect the sizes that stores carry or the shapes of their mannequins. “Women have to have curves and when they are older, they cannot be thin,” she said.
Sandra Criado Mosteles, 29, a window dresser at clothing stores in Madrid said the mannequins she works with are so thin that even the smallest sizes have to be taken in with pins to make them fit. “It’s a bit deceiving,” she said.
Mosteles also welcomes the government’s push to standardize sizes. “I would like to know the (real) sizes so that I could go into stores and go exactly to the size,” she said. “When you are going to buy, it is much easier.”
Measuring the After Effects
Another woman, an immigrant and mother from South America, said she rarely feels like shopping for pants because sizes are distorted and because she has difficulty finding pants that fit her curvy hips.
“If they don’t fit you well, then you become nervous that you are fat,” she said while riding on the city’s metro. “You go home and want to start a diet.”
While sizing inconsistency is rampant around the world, Spanish officials say the country is the first to embark on such a rigorous and comprehensive scientific study aimed at remedying the problem.
No European law obligates sizes to conform to certain measurements, Heras said.
Spain began leading the way against fashion’s ultra-thin pressures a couple of years ago, when the Madrid regional government decided to exclude models with a body mass index of under 18 from its 2006 international fashion week.
Italy followed suit by banning underweight models from its Milan fashion show.
New York City’s fashion week, which ended earlier this month, has yet to ban underweight models. This year fashion reporters pointed out that the current male models were noticeably skinnier than in previous years.
Brenda Gazzar is a freelance journalist based in the Middle East. She did the reporting for this story during a recent visit to Spain.
Everyday I recieve a little note from Daily Candy, which alerts me to the wonders of the world. Sometimes they are trite, but most often it’s a worthwhile read…lets me know what’s up in the world of travel etc.
Today I recieved this:
February 5, 2008
BungGlow 8
South Beach Skin Solutions Lightening Gel
Van Morrison wrote the song “Brown Eyed Girl” as an endearing ode to a former love.
And while some will always argue that brown eyes are classic, others are looking for a change.
It has come to our attention that it is no longer acceptable for your bunghole to be, well, brown. (Yeah, we said bunghole.) And South Beach Skin Solutions has developed a lightening gel that is safe for that sensitive area (no, we have not tried it).
The natural product claims to give your poopshooter “a fresher, more youthful look” by making it blend in with your natural skin tone. (Seriously?) Here’s how it works: The gentle formula first exfoliates then naturally depigments and whitens the backdoor by reducing the activity of tyrosinase (an enzyme responsible for darkening) in the skin.
They claim you’ll see results in just a few weeks, or else you get your money back.
Consider it your ace in the hole.
Available online at southbeachskinsolutions.com.
ICK!!!
There are moments when beauty goes so far that I am beyond uncomfortable…I am just disgusted.
No need to homogonize your anus. The world will go on if it remains its god given color.
Filed under: Abortion, Activism, Anti-Feminist Propoganda, Arms, Art, Beauty, Birth Control, Body Beautiful, Body Image, Celebrities, Classic, Double Standard, Education, Election 2008, Femimommy, Feminism, Feminist, Feminist Consumerism, Friends, Gay Marriage, Great Books, Guns, Hillary Clinton, Hollywood, Honor Killing, John Kerry, Men, Politicians, Politics, Sex Education, Women's roles, obama, personal, television
SO I HATE TO PASS ALONG MESSAGES SECOND HAND, ESPECIALLY WHEN I HAVEN’T WRITTEN IN A WHILE….BUT THIS IS WORTH IT.
Message from NOW PAC Chair Kim Gandy:
In a few hours, at 4:15 am to be exact, I’m headed out in the cold to yet another airport, this time to Chattanooga and then Knoxville, Tennessee to rally and speak for Hillary Clinton.
I’d go anywhere, any time, to shout from the rooftops that Hillary Clinton is the right choice for women, for our families, for our communities and for our future.
Here is why I care so much:
Hillary Clinton is a national leader of the highest order, with the strength and determination and experience to deliver real change to our country. She has been a leader on women’s rights and civil rights for over 30 years.
It is of special importance to me that Hillary is an unparalleled champion for women’s reproductive rights, justice and health. In fact, I’ve just signed a letter from many leaders: Martha Burk, Gloria Feldt, Cecelia Fire Thunder, Lulu Flores, Ellen Malcolm, Irene Natividad, Ellie Smeal, Gloria Steinem, and Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones on why Hillary is the best choice for those of us who care so deeply about these issues.
Hillary has been through fire and emerged stronger with each challenge. She can take anything the Republicans can dish out, and give it back double. The Democrats need her, the country needs her, and she needs your vote on Tuesday.
Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton is the strongest candidate to win in November, and to set our country right. She beat the Republicans in two landslide elections, despite predictions that she couldn’t win in upstate and rural New York. And it will take someone with her economic and national security strengths to beat John McCain. We know she can deliver on Day One — from getting our troops out of Iraq, to fixing the shattered economy and the mortgage crisis, to winning health care that covers every single person in this country.
Please vote on Tuesday for Hillary Clinton, and if you haven’t done it already, please email your friends and contacts in the Super Tuesday states and tell them that:
from her earliest days advising battered women, helping abused children, and providing free legal services to the poor,
to her time in the White House advocating for universal healthcare, championing the S-CHIP (State Child Health Insurance) program, and helping to pass the Violence Against Women Act,
to her service as a U.S. Senator, standing strong for reproductive rights and writing legislation to expand contraceptive access, helping win approval of emergency contraception, sponsoring equal pay legislation, and speaking out on the floor against the nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court, specifically saying that they would damage Roe v. Wade if confirmed. She was right, and I know we can count on her to nominate pro-women, pro-choice judges to the courts at every level.
She’s always stood up for us, and now it’s time for us to stand up for her with our vote and say “I’m Ready for Hillary.”
I’m ready.
P.S. Robin Morgan’s terrific new essay “Goodbye To All That (#2)” calls out the stereotypes, double standards and toxic viciousness against Hillary Clinton – Our President, Ourselves – and she concludes: “Me, I’m voting for Hillary not because she’s a woman-but because I am.”
Filed under: Abortion, Art, Beauty, Birth Control, Body Beautiful, Body Image, Celebrities, Double Standard, Feminism, Feminist, Hollywood, Movies, Sex Education, Women's roles
So in honor of Ellen Page and others getting an Oscar tap for Juno, I thought I’d blog about this truly nifty little film.
Juno is the story of a precocious teenager who finds herself pregnant and decides to give her baby to a “deserving” couple rather than have an abortion. It’s worth mentioning that this film is definitely a farce and social critique. You are meant to laugh and see truisms in this less than lifelike world. For example, no parent has ever taken their daughter’s teenage pregnancy as well as Juno’s parent’s do, and no teenager is as equipped to handle life as well as Juno does. As long as you keep this in mind, Juno reveals itself as a touching and hilarious film, featuring a strong-minded, smart protagonist, which us feminists can adore.
A tid-bit about me that most of you don’t know, I have a MFA in creative writing, which means I am eligible for two things, I excruciating job teaching college composition and the right to point out really bad and really great writing. (I paid close to 60,000 dollars for this privilege. Dope.)
Embracing my place in the world as a homegrown and ridiculously over-educated critic, I’m telling you that Juno is smart, funny, clean writing. Diablo Cody brings rich sarcasm and cutting style to the page.
With this meaty script to work with, director Jason Riteman (Thank you for Not Smoking) and Canadian actor Ellen Page gracefully bring to life the world of this a knocked up and delightfully awkward 16 year old. Watch the trailer, go see the film, it’s easily worth two hours of your life and your hard earned pennies:
Check out the blog by Juno’s writer: The Pussy Ranch
Filed under: Beauty, Body Beautiful, Body Image, Double Standard, Feminism, Feminist, Rant
But according to OLAY: “You can have skin that looks too young for it.”
I know, I know, please will I stop ranting about the nature of the beauty industry, but it’s everywhere I turn. The more aware I become the less I want to participate with mainstream society. (I never did that well to begin with, but still.)
I was watching two and a half men the other day, which I thought was a funny and cute show, but I guess I haven’t seen the show all that many times. I hear a lot of people talk about how funny it is, and it has its moments, but wow is it chauvinist. In these two episodes I saw a woman conjoled with shopping and two men bribed into loving their mother’s boyfriend when he paid for their prostitutes. Lovely, huh?
I do not want to become one of those people who is insists on political correctness. To be honest, I can’t stand being in the room with that type of person and I certianly don’t want to be friends with them. Life should come naturally and not feel contrived but when we consider the constant force with which the beauty industry attacks our self esteem, it’s no wonder that the world is filled with double standards and negitive images of beauty.
Filed under: Beauty, Body Beautiful, Body Image, Double Standard, Feminism, Feminist, Rant, Women's roles, ageism
SO the cover of this month’s star (I think, might be another rag mag) features an article entitled “Hollywood’s Best and Worst Beach Bodies” On the left side is Hayden, whatever her last name is from Heroes and on the right side is a picture positioned just so that the woman in visible from only the neck down.
This headless woman is less tight than Hayden, who may I remind you isn’t even twenty years old yet.
Turns out the headless woman is Cindy Crawford, Supermodel and possible canidate for Goddess of Beauty. HELLO!! This woman has been the standard to which we’ve lived up to for years and now because she has kids and she’s older than she used to be you want me to replace her with the younger model and compete with that?? Cindy in gorgeous. Always will be.
The world needs to get a handle on this out of control beauty issue, which may be why I took fault with the intro to the Beauty Myth all those weeks ago. This issue with beauty and aging is an impossible burden. BEAUTY GROWS OLD. OLD DOES NOT EQUAL UGLY!
THIS WOMAN HAS AN AMAZING BODY:
Notice that this picture was taken on exactly the same day as the “worst” shot.
By the way, Cindy has been supporting another favorite in the fight for the beautiful, yet normal woman, Jennifer Love Hewitt.
Filed under: Art, Body Beautiful, Body Image, Election 2008, Feminism, Feminist, Hillary Clinton, Politicians, Travel
So I’ve just returned from Washington DC, which was absolutely inspiring. If any of you have the oportunity to go, do. We visited all the govenment buildings. I was particularly mpressed by the capital building. First off the rotunda is extrememly beautiful and secondly, there is fairly strong female representation in the joint. Well, strong may be the wrong word. There is a feeling that historic females are represented, which is good.
I picked up a great Hillary in 2008 pin, which features Rosie the Riveter. Most of the weekend I was overcome by how impactful it feels to have Nancy Pelosi at the helm of congress and Hillary running for president. It’s an amazing year for american women.
I have been hesitent to support Hillary because I wanted to be sure that I wasn’t just doing so because she was a woman, but this weekend I got to thinking and what I’ve actually been doing is denying my support for her because she is a woman. Deep down inside I fear that a woman cannot win and we need change for the better, before it’s too late. I have always liked Hillary and Bill despite their personal issues. I think they are talented “governers.” (By that I mean people who govern.) So, hopeful that the world isn’t as awful as I think, I’ve decided that for me it’s Hillary in 2008!
Perhaps later in the week I’ll talk some spicific points about why I like Hillary.
One other note, while I was in Washington DC I had the opportunity to visit the National Museum of Women in the Arts. WOW! An absolutely awesome place. Right now they are featuring WACK! Art and the Feminist Revolution. Please, if you have the opportunity to see this exhibit, GO. I cannot teel you how much feelining and passion emenates from these works, concerned with eveything from body image to feverish political activism. Really awesome.
Filed under: Anti-Feminist Propoganda, Beauty, Body Beautiful, Body Image, Feminism, Feminist, Hollywood, plastic surgery
I thought perhaps some of you out here in the blogosphere might be interested in this moment from my paper:
In order to understand ease with which we accept surgical modification, we must understand that with help from the media we have learned to categorize plastic surgery as an easy and simple modification process, which makes us better than we are. This point is exemplified by examining the article, “Booby Prize for Bunny Adrianne,” which was published in the December 2007 issue of Star. The beginning of the article reads:
Adrienne Curry will grace the cover of Playboy magazine for a second time in January – and she’ll be showing off something new: This time the reality TV star is sporting a bigger cup size. “Adrienne is so proud of her new boobs,” says a source. “She wants the whole word see how much curvier she is. She feels sexier than ever.”
Now, while you and I would not aspire to grace the cover of Playboy, there are many women who do and there are many people who believe that the women found on the pages of Playboy epitomize ideal physical Beauty. So, having your image on the cover of Playboy is a beauty status symbol and Adrienne Curry has this opportunity for a “second time.” Why? The implication of the article is that her “bigger cup size” makes her “sexier than ever,” and therefore Playboy wants her all over again. Curry is “sporting” her “new” boobs, like new accessory; she is “proud” to have undergone this surgery to perfect her appearance. The nonchalant, casual word, “sporting,” often used to describe throwing on something new and fashionable, implies that gaining these new breasts was simple, casual even. Photographs exemplifying Curry’s breast enhancement accompany the text. The smaller, less busty image is overpowered by the larger new and “curvier” Curry, reinforcing the idea that it is more worthwhile to look at her because she is more beautiful after her breast augmentation. Nowhere in the article is there any connotation that Curry’s breast augmentation was anything but positive. The article even adds that unlike “most models,” Curry was not “nervous or awkward” about her naked body. Curry’s surgery is presented solely as a means of increasing her Beauty status and creating happier more confident women.
YUCK! Bad Star Magazine, BAD!
A few months back Jenifer Love Hewitt was scrutinized by the paparazzi press. As usual she was held to a ridiculous body standard and she’s decided to speak up about the state of beauty in our media crazed society. Read her rant on I’m Not Obsessed.
Update: Now CNN is chatting up Love Hewitt
Click to check out Flesh Wounds.Originally uploaded by Laiven
Virgina Blum explores the idea that have allowed for the modern culture of cosmetic surgery. She is particularly interested is how we have come to accept the body as physically malleable. It is her contention that our acceptance of extreme cosmetic surgeries is directly tied to celebrity worship and our desire to emulate these false icons. Really interesting and amazing book, particularly if you like Susan Bordo.



